MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977085563

EMG-based Force Estimation using Artificial Neural Networks

2019· article· en· W2977085563 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCMBES Proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrachioradialisArtificial neural networkBicepsIsometric exerciseArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Head (geology)Time domainSpeech recognitionComputer vision
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the surface electromyogram (sEMG) signals acquired from linear surface electrode arrays, placed on the long head and short head of biceps brachii, and brachioradialis during isometric contractions are used to estimate force induced at the wrist using an artificial neural network (ANN).We extracted some features, in time and frequency domain, from sEMG signals and used them as inputs to the ANN model. Different hidden layer sizes were considered to investigate its effect on the model accuracy and find the appropriate number of neurons for our problem. Also, we studied the model accuracy, where we used features individually as the model’s input. The best accuracy, during train, validation and test, was obtained for the maximum number of sEMG features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it