Sur la corde raide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On retrouve un impératif de formation des professionnels des milieux de la santé et de l’éducation dans la plupart des plans de lutte contre la radicalisation violente dont se sont dotés nombre de gouvernements. Peu d’études ont cependant évalué ces formations ou pensé les processus qu’elles mobilisent. À partir de l’analyse qualitative de formations portant sur la prévention de la radicalisation violente au Québec, cet article interroge les modalités de transmission de savoirs sur une telle thématique. En décrivant les mouvements que certains contenus ont suscités au sein des groupes de participants, nous proposons que la capacité à contenir l’incertitude et l’angoisse que génère l’ampleur des phénomènes de polarisation et leurs dérives violentes est un des défis principaux de ces formations. Enfin, les dispositifs favorisant l’établissement d’un climat de confiance dans le cadre des formations sont discutés de façon plus large.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".