MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977255816 · doi:10.2134/industrialhemp.c4

Hemp Agronomy‐Grain and Fiber Production

2019· book-chapter· en· W2977255816 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kostuik Jeff, W Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueASSA, CSSA and SSSA · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgronomyLoamEnvironmental scienceSoil waterCrop rotationNutrientSoil fertilityCropBiologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemp is both a heliotrope and thermophilic crop. There are some key environmental factors that influence the early growth and development of hemp. These include sunlight, temperature, soil condition or tilth, and soil moisture. Hemp can grow and survive on a wide range of soil types. Soils that have adequate tilth so as to not negatively affect plant available water, such as loam to sandy loam soils high in fertility are most recommended for hemp grain and fiber production. Hemp is an oilseed, and thus works best in a crop rotation with either a cereal crop or preferably a legume, just as any other field crop rotation. This chapter presents a nutrient uptake trial conducted in Manitoba Agriculture in 1999. Nitrogen is a key nutrient in hemp grain production. Weed control is extremely important for successfully growing hemp for grain and fiber and for maintaining quality of the harvested products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASSA, CSSA and SSSASame topicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsFrench-language works237,207