Encyclopedia of music in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HELMUT KALLMANN, GILLESPOTVIN, and KENNETH WINTERS, eds. Encyclopedia of Music in Canada. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1981, xxix, 1076 pp. Canadian Music: the P.R. Success Canada; the country that one forgets. So said the commentator on a German current affairs television program in 1978. Anyone who has been out of for any length of time cannot help but notice the lack of coverage of all things Canadian, political as well as artistic, in the international press. It was not surprising, then, that John Beckwith, in his seminal article, About Canadian Music: the P.R. Failure, which first appeared in 1969 in Musicanada, cited editor and critic Robert Fulford as saying that appears as a great blank on the literary Now, thanks to the publication of the Encyclopedia of Music in (EMC), no one in the musical community, at home or abroad, can ignore the fact that has a thriving musical life and an interesting and varied past. Without underestimating the individual achievements of scholars such as Willy Amtmann, Beckwith, Kailman, Keith MacMillan, George Proctor, and Clifford Ford, it is the EMC which has put firmly on the musical map. Beckwith's article, reprinted with additional material in Music (the magazine of the American Guild of Organists and Royal College of Organists) in the summer of 1970, became a kind of classic. It revealed all the blatant misinformation published or the dearth of information available about Canadian music in the world encyclopedias and reference books. It was the kind of model answer you would give your bibliography classes to read in the early seventies, after having asked them to look up Canada in the works on the reference shelves of the music library. In its original form in Musicanada, this article was distributed through the foresight of the Canadian Music Centre, to subscribers of Notes: The Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association in the United States. It was to have far more widespread implications. Beckwith threw stones at a large international pond of misinformation. The ripples spread out far and wide. Even if you were unaware of the current state of new music, performance, musical institutions, or scholarship in or about Canadian music, you were aware of Beckwith's articles. Everyone in the musical community today knows that it was Beckwith's article which became the impetus for publisher and philanthropist Floyd Chalmers to remedy the situation by generously providing the initial funding for a comprehensive musical reference work. He believed that it was essential for herself to fully document her musical achievements before the rest of the world could be expected to talk intelligently about them. This story and its consequences have become history. It is documented in the introduction to the EMC (p. xii) and repeated in most of the reviews. Yet a word of caution is necessary. Beckwith himself is the first to admit that this story, though good public relations, is an oversimplication which does not correspond historically with what happened. Beckwith's article was not a bolt from the blue. Rather, it struck a nerve and in so doing gained a positive response. For Kallmann had already been planning, ever since the appearance of his path-breaking book, A History of Music in 1534-1914, to bring out some kind of reference book in conventional dictionary format as a follow-up. No one can overestimate Kallmann's contribution to our knowledge about Canadian musical life and history and the succes of the EMC is due in no small part to him and to his own tremendous personal knowledge. With Kallmann at the helm to oversee content, Gilles Potvin and Kenneth Winters responsible for the French and English texts, respectively, this venture grew and grew - like Topsy, as the Toronto Star's William Littler put it - until it finally emerged in that magnificent volume which should be on every Canadian musician's reference shelf. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".