O Brasil segundo o IPHAN: a preservação do patrimônio cultural brasileiro durante a gestão de Gilberto Gil no MinC (2003-2008)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subject of this thesis is the role played by the Institut of National Historic and Artistic Heritage (Iphan) in the development of public policies for the conservation of Brazilian cultural heritage during the administration of the minister Gilberto Gil's ahead the Ministry of Culture (MinC). Its goal is to investigate if the considerable broadening of Iphan's institutional activity corresponded to a greater share of responsibility with other groups involved in the conservation field and to social involvement of the various "constituent groups of the Brazilian society" as states the Federal Constitution of 1988. To do so, Iphan's role is analyzed under its institutional, social and conceptual aspects seeking three specific objectives. The first one is the definition of the Brazilian cultural heritage conservation field and the evaluation of its vertical and horizontal institutional impacts upon Iphan, caused by minister Gilberto Gil's cultural policies, by other agencies of the Federal Government, by state and municipal public authorities and by sectors of civil society. The second is the identification of social agents and their agencies for legitimizing, contesting or reassuring values in play in the conservation field, including social groups and communities that presented demands for or against the protection of cultural
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it