MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977428605 · doi:10.14740/jh543

Coagulation Parameters in Adult Patients With Type-1 Gaucher Disease

2019· article· en· W2977428605 on OpenAlexaffvenue
J. Serratrice, P. Chérìn, Olivier Lidove, Esther Noël, A. Masseau, V. Leguy‐Seguin, R. Jaussaud, Isabelle Marié, Christian Lavigne, F. Maillot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
FundersSanofi GenzymeSanofi
KeywordsMedicineCoagulationPlateletInternal medicineGastroenterologyCoagulation testingDiseaseClotting factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Gaucher disease is a rare inborn error of lysosomal metabolism, characterized by lysosomal storage of the β-glucosylceramide. Bleedings observed in type-1 Gaucher disease (GD1) are commonly attributed to a low platelet count, but they can also occur when the platelet count is normal or slightly low. Abnormal platelet function has been described and deficiencies in coagulation factors too, such as factors II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, and von Willebrand factor. However, studies are few in number, involving few patients and having varying conclusions. The aim of this study was to analyze clotting factor deficiencies in a larger cohort of French patients with GD1. METHODS: This is an observational national study. The coagulation parameters were collected during routine GD1 monitoring and described retrospectively. RESULTS: We highlighted low levels of various coagulation factors in 46% of the patients with GD1. The most frequent coagulation abnormalities encountered were factor V, X, XI, and XII deficiencies. Deficits were usually mild and coagulation abnormalities tended to be more frequent in non-splenectomized patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, frequent and varied coagulation abnormalities were found in a high proportion of GD1 patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207