MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B03: The endochondral bone protein CHM1 sustains an undifferentiated, invasive phenotype promoting lung metastasis in Ewing sarcoma

2018· article· en· W2977439680 on OpenAlexaff
Kristina von Heyking, Julia Calzada‐Wack, Stefanie Göllner, Oxana Schmidt, Tim Hensel, David Schirmer, Annette Fasan, Carsten Müller‐Tidow, Poul Sorensen, Stefan Burdach, Günther Richter

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetastasisCancer researchMedicineSarcomaRNA interferencePathogenesisPathologyBiologyCancerInternal medicineRNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES), an osteogenic malignancy that mainly affects children and young adults, is characterized by early metastasis to lung and bone. In the clinical setting, prognosis for patients with metastatic ES at diagnosis is clearly worse than for those without metastases (5-year survival > 30%). Hence, there is an urgent need to understand the fundamental molecular mechanisms of ES differentiation, invasion, and metastasis to possibly identify novel therapeutic strategies to prevent metastasis. The purpose of this study was to shed further light into the function of Chondromodulin 1 (CHM1) on ES pathogenesis, especially on metastasis, and at best to establish new therapeutic targets. Material and Methods: Expression of CHM1 was analyzed using microarrays and its function was examined by RNA interference (RNAi). To analyze resulting changes qRT-PCR, ELISA, FACS, IHC, proliferation and invasion assays, as well as a xeno-transplant model in immune deficient mice were applied. Results: In this study, we investigated the role of the BRICHOS chaperon domain containing endochondral bone protein chondromodulin I (CHM1) in ES pathogenesis. CHM1 is significantly overexpressed in ES and ChIP data demonstrate CHM1 to be directly bound by EWS-FLI1. Using RNA interference we demonstrate that CHM1 enhanced contact-dependent as well as independent proliferation and the invasive potential of ES cells in vitro. This invasiveness was in part mediated via CHM1-regulated MMP9 expression. In a xenograft mouse model CHM1 was essential for the establishment of lung metastases, which is in line with the observed increased CHM1 expression in patient specimens with ES lung metastases. Mechanistically, CHM1 promoted chondrogenic differentiation capacity of ES cells but suppressed endothelial differentiation. Further, CHM1 suppressed the number of TRAP+ osteoclasts in an orthotopic model of tumor growth in line with suppression of osteolytic genes such as HIF1A, IL6, JAG1, and VEGF, indicating that CHM1-blocked osteomimicry might play a role in homing, colonization, and invasion into bone tissues. Conclusions: Our results suggest that CHM1 is an important player suppressing endothelial differentiation capacity and seems essential for the invasive and metastatic capacities of ES. Citation Format: Kristina von Heyking, Julia Calzada-Wack, Stefanie Göllner, Oxana Schmidt, Tim Hensel, David Schirmer, Annette Fasan, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Poul Sorensen, Stefan Burdach, Günther H.S. Richter. The endochondral bone protein CHM1 sustains an undifferentiated, invasive phenotype promoting lung metastasis in Ewing sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Conference on Advances in Sarcomas: From Basic Science to Clinical Translation; May 16-19, 2017; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(2_Suppl):Abstract nr B03.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.512
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→