MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New potential of Trimetazidine MB for coronary heart disease treatment in the real-world clinical practice: results of the Russian multi-centre randomised study PERSPECTIVE (Part II)

2011· article· en· W2977466717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY AND PREVENTION · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrimetazidineMedicineEjection fractionCOPDInternal medicineCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyConcomitantAnginaAmbulatoryHeart failureCardiologyUnstable anginaCoronary heart diseaseMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim. As a clinical part of the Russian multi-centre randomised study, to assess the clinical benefits and safety of adding Trimetazidine MB to the standard treatment scheme in patients with stable angina (SA), in order to optimise their ambulatory therapy and improve their compliance. Material and methods . The study included 981 patients with Functional Class (FC) II-III SA and various concomitant diseases and syndromes, such as chronic heart failure (CHF), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in smokers. All participants were divided into two groups: Group I (n=838) received standard therapy plus trimetazidine MB (70 mg/d, twice a day), while Group II (n=143) received standard therapy only. The treatment and follow-up phases lasted for 12 months. Results. In Group I, the weekly number of angina attacks decreased by 42 % from the baseline at one month ( р <0,0001), and by 70 % at 12 months ( р <0,0001). The number of nitroglycerin (NTG) tablets taken decreased, respectively, by 41 % ( р <0,0001) and 68 % ( р <0,0001). In Group II, the decrease in angina attack number and NTG tablet number was significant only at 6 months and was less pronounced than in Group I. Therefore, in Group I, the number of patients with FC I increased by 7 times, while the number of FC III patients decreased by 1,8 times. No marked FC dynamics was observed in Group II. In Group I, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased by 2,4 % ( р <0,001), while interventricular septum and LV posterior wall thickness decreased, respectively, by 4,2 % ( р <0,01) and 3,5 % ( р <0,01). These parameters, however, did not change substantially in Group II patients. At 12 months, the number of patients hospitalised due to clinical decompensation, or becoming disable, was twice as high in Group II as in Group I. Conclusion. The Russian “PERSPECTIVE” Study results demonstrated high clinical effectiveness and safety ofTrimetazidineMB therapy, combined with standard treatment, in SA patients with CHF, DM-2, and COPD. Therefore, metabolic therapy could be more widely used in the real-world clinical settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it