MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

C-Reactive Protein Levels in Moderate to Severe Crohnʼs Disease Patients Decreased Rapidly and Significantly During Adalimumab Therapy

2011· article· en· W2977528635 on OpenAlexaff
Subrata Ghosh, Eric Q. Wu, Arielle G. Bensimon, Parvez Mulani, Mei Yang, Jingdong Chao

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdalimumabC-reactive proteinInternal medicineMcNemar's testGastroenterologyPlaceboCrohn's diseaseStatistical significanceAcute-phase proteinRandomized controlled trialDiseaseInflammationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a plasma protein involved in the acute phase of inflammatory response. In patients with Crohn's disease (CD), CRP level provides a useful biologic marker for monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy. Methods: We examined the effect of adalimumab induction therapy on rapid reduction in CRP levels among patients with moderate to severe CD (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450), as well as moderate CD (baseline CDAI <300) only. The study used data from CHARM, a Phase III trial in which all patients received adalimumab 80 mg at baseline (Week 0) and 40 mg at Week 2 before being randomized to placebo or continuing adalimumab treatment at Week 4. Within the intent-to-treat sample (N=778), analyses included patients who had a CRP value recorded at both baseline and Week 2; patients without a CRP measurement at Week 4 had their Week-2 value carried forward. Mean changes in CRP from baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 were evaluated for statistical significance using paired Student t-tests. McNemar's tests were used to assess changes in the proportion of patients with elevated CRP (>1 mg/dL) from baseline to Weeks 2 and 4. As a subgroup analysis, CRP outcomes were also evaluated among patients with moderate CD. Results: At baseline, CRP levels (mean±standard deviation) were 2.15±3.28 mg/dL among patients with moderate to severe CD (N=767) and 1.63±2.22 among patients with moderate CD (N=367). After adalimumab induction therapy, mean changes from baseline in CRP were statistically significant by Week 2 (-1.26±2.96) and Week 4 (-0.97±3.14) in the overall sample (both p<0.001). The proportion of patients with CRP >1 mg/dL decreased from 46.4% at baseline to 21.3% at Week 2 and 24.1% at Week 4 (both p<0.001 vs. baseline). In the subset of patients with moderate CD, CRP decreased by an average of -0.93±1.84 and -0.60±2.09 from baseline to Weeks 2 and 4, respectively (both p<0.001). Significantly fewer patients with moderate CD showed elevated CRP at Weeks 2 and 4 compared to baseline (15.5% and 20.7% vs. 41.4%; both p<0.001). Among patients with elevated CRP at baseline but not Week 4 (N=189), remission rate at Week 52 was 35.8% for the adalimumab arm eow+weekly vs. 9.1% for the placebo arm (p<0.001). Conclusion: Adalimumab was associated with rapid and statistically significant reductions in CRP within 4 weeks among patients with moderate to severe CD. Similar decreases in CRP were observed among patients with moderate CD. Disclosure: Dr. S Ghosh - Advisory Board: Abbott, Centocor, Merck, Pfizer, Shire; Honoraria for Lecturing in Educational Events: Abbott, Merck, Shire; Research Support: Abbott, Merck. Drs. EQ Wu & AG Bensimon - Employee: Analysis Group, under contract with Abbott. Drs. PM Mulani, M Yang, & J Chao - Employee and Stockholder: Abbott.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→