Reflexões em torno de uma pesquisa de Renée Legris : A figura dos ameríndios na teleficção quebequense.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente texto se inscreve na mesa Hommage à Renée Legris do colóquio Représentations des dynamiques urbaines dans la littérature et le cinéma du Québec et du Brésil, no 85º congresso da ACFAS. A representação do ameríndio na teleficção do Québec (teleteatros e telenovelas) foi a temática selecionada para sublinhar uma das vertentes do imenso trabalho dessa pesquisadora de peso sobre a mídia do Canada. Pesquisando mais de 500 obras, Legris encontrou apenas uma dúzia que trata da presença do ameríndio na sociedade quebequense. Buscando o apoio do conceito de heterotopia (FOUCAULT), e reflexões sobre a alteridade através do termo jurídico da estraneidade, podemos explicitar as diferentes fases de integração problemática do ameríndio na sociedade quebequense. Na teleficção, o ameríndio foi sempre visto como um Outro, tão estrangeiro quanto os imigrantes recentes.Palavras-chave: Renée Legris. Ameríndio. Teleficção. Radio-Canada. Shehaweh. Au nom du père et du fils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".