Removal of Silica from in-Situ Produced Water By Electrocoagulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compared to water treatment by chemical coagulation, electrocoagulation produces less sludge, leads to only a small change of pH, and can have lower operating costs. Operating costs are a combination of operating labour, electrical power and replacemnt of the consumable metal electrodes. In this study we report the performance of EC for silica removal from in-situ produced water and blowdown, including the energy and metal consumption required per unit volume of treated water, under a range of operating conditions. The use of polarity reversal to control electrode fouling is investigated, as well as some novel operating conditions. With polarity reversal, the particle size distribution of precipitated coagulant changes depending on the frequency of the reversal. At high frequency there is less electrode fouling, but the particle size formed is smaller, so separation of the solids becomes more challenging. We use laser scanning confocal microscopy with pH sensitive fluourescent dyes to observe the precipitation process occuring in the pH boundary layer at the electrode surface. This approach reveals the influence of polarity reversal and mass transport on the coagulation process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".