MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diagnostic Delays in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2014· article· en· W2977541915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseColonoscopyIrritable bowel syndromeIncidence (geometry)ReferralMedical diagnosisAbdominal painDiseaseTriageMedical recordUlcerative colitisDiverticulitisRetrospective cohort studyPsychological interventionInternal medicineEmergency medicineColorectal cancerCancerFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Canada has the highest reported incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the world. IBD has significant impact on quality of life and also a substantial economic burden on health care system, amounting to $12,000 annually per patient with IBD. Earlier diagnoses of IBD and earlier therapeutic interventions have been associated with reduction in surgical and hospitalization rates in patients with IBD. A significant challenge in the diagnosis of IBD is its similarities with Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), as patients present with similar symptoms including diarrhea and abdominal pain. The gold standard for distinguishing the two is a colonoscopy, which remains a scarce resource. Our objective is to determine the time to diagnosis of newly referred patients with suspected IBD. We evaluate new referrals with suspected IBD and determine the wait times both to be seen in the clinic and to undergo an endoscopic evaluation. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review looking at new referrals to IBD clinic from January 2013 to December 2013. All new consultations were reviewed and data pertaining to patient demographic, disease onset, disease severity, referral, and triage process were recorded. Patients who have been seen previously in the IBD clinic and patients who failed to attend their appointment were excluded. Clinic wait time, time to endoscopy, diagnostic delay was determined. Results: In total 145 charts were reviewed. Out of these 62 patients had a previous diagnosis of IBD and 69 patients were undifferentiated. Looking at the latter group, 23 patients were diagnosed with IBS, 7 with Crohn’s disease, and 6 with ulcerative colitis. There were no significant differences in clinic wait times and endoscopy times for patients diagnosed with IBD vs. IBS (p=0.78, p=0.67 respectively). Diagnostic delays were significantly different for patients with IBD vs. IBS at 17 months and 60 months respectively (p=0.003). Conclusion: Comparable wait times and endoscopy times for patients with IBD and IBS are consistent with their clinical similarities. However, they also suggest the need for better triaging process and noninvasive diagnostic studies to risk stratify patients. We plan to study this further by closely looking at referrals, formulating a standardized referral form. In addition to this, we plan to study whether triage on basis of fecal calprotectin will have an effect on wait times and diagnostic delays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it