MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977578656 · doi:10.31001/biomedika.v12i1.406

Hubungan Motivasi dengan Perilaku Ibu Post Partum dalam Melakukan Mobilisasi Dini

2019· article· id· W2977578656 on OpenAlexaff
Ferilia Adiesti

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedika · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
FundersUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
KeywordsPost partumGynecologyMedicinePhysicsPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perdarahan Pasca persalinan merupakan salah satu penyebab kematian pada ibu. Yang mana penyebab terbanyak dari perdarahan pasca persalinan tersebut 50-60% karena kelemahan otot atau tidak adanya kontraksi uterus. Hal ini bias disebabkan karena ibu post partum tidak melakukan mobilisasi dini pasca bersalin normal 24 jam pertama setelah proses persalinan dan hari-hari berikutnya. Rancang bangun analitik - cross sectional. Jumlah sampel sebanyak 28 orang dan teknik pengambilan sampel consecutive sampling. Variabel independen adalah motivasi ibu post partum melakukan mobilisasi dini, sedangkan variabel dependentnya adalah perilaku ibu post partum dalam melakukan mobilisasi dini, pengumpulan data dengan menggunakan kuesioner. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian bahwa lebih dari 50% responden (60%) tidak termotivasi dalam melakukan mobilisasi dini, paling banyak perilaku ibu post partum melakukan mobilisasi dini adalah kurang sebanyak t orang (48%). Hasil uji wilcoxon didapatkan bahwa α hitung lebih kecil dari α tabel yaitu 0,000 < 0,05, artinya ada hubungan antara motivasi dengan perilaku ibu dalam melakukan mobilisasi dini. Diharapkan bidan dapat memberikan informasi tentang mobilisasi dini dengan menerapkan langsung dan juga membantu ibu post partum dalam melakukan mobilisasi dini sehingga ibu post partum tidak takut untuk melakukan mobilisasi dini.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedikaSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207