Le golfe du Saint-Laurent et le Centre-Ouest français
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles, les relations entre la France et la Nouvelle-France se sont avant tout concentrées sur quelques espaces privilégiés. Les ports de La Rochelle, Rochefort, Les Sables d’Olonne, Bordeaux ou Nantes, du côté français, Québec, Plaisance ou Louisbourg, du côté canadien, occupent une place centrale dans l’animation de ces échanges (économiques, culturels, migratoires, diplomatiques) : la pêche à Terre-Neuve, la guerre et le commerce y soutiennent une intense activité, qui contribue au dynamisme de tout un ensemble de ports secondaires et à la formation de sociétés littorales originales. Profondément distendues après la conquête anglaise et le traité de Paris (1763), ces relations reprennent au XIXe siècle, la France et ses anciennes colonies jouant désormais de leur histoire commune pour se projeter, ensemble, vers l’avenir. C’est à l’étude de ces liens riches et complexes que s’attache la vingtaine de textes rassemblés ici. La redéfinition actuelle du concept d’histoire atlantique en légitime la relecture, tout en favorisant les approches comparatives. Encore trop souvent oubliée, l’identité maritime de la Nouvelle-France – Acadie incluse –, avec ses héritages contemporains, s’impose elle-même comme un front pionnier de l’historiographie franco-canadienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".