MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977642222 · doi:10.1061/9780784482292.381

A Trajectory-Mining Approach to Derive Travel Time Skim Matrix in Dynamic Traffic Assignment

2019· article· en· W2977642222 on OpenAlexaff
Ye Tian, Yi-Chang Chiu, Jian Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueCICTP 2019 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTrajectoryImpedance parametersMatrix (chemical analysis)Travel timePath (computing)Mode (computer interface)Scale (ratio)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmElectrical impedanceTransport engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The travel impedance skim matrix is one of the essential intermediate products within transportation forecasting models. It reflects interzonal travel costs and is explicitly utilized in trip distribution and mode choice models. The traditional method of obtaining skim matrices is to execute multiple iterations of all-to-one or one-to-one time dependent shortest path algorithms. However, the computational and memory usage limits can be easily reached when dealing with mega-scale networks such as those with thousands of zones. This paper proposes two new ideas of extracting the interzonal travel impedance information from the already existing vehicle trajectories. The numerical experiments highlight huge potential advantages of the proposed approaches in terms of saving both memory and CPU time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCICTP 2019Same topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207