MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977673628

Vehicle Trajectory Reconstruction Based on Improved Cubic Hermite Interpolation

2013· article· en· W2977673628 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Zhi-ju

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport Information and Safety · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonotone cubic interpolationHermite interpolationSpline interpolationCubic Hermite splineTrajectoryInterpolation (computer graphics)Cubic functionMathematicsHermite polynomialsBicubic interpolationComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsBilinear interpolationMotion (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicle trajectory records the vehicle location and time sequence,which is significant for analyzing the abnormal state of vehicle and traffic accident recurrence.The equipments that are installed in vehicle and roadside are affected by the environment and the performance of sensors.As a result,the incomplete and abnormal deviations of trajectories are obtained.Therefore,trajectory reconstruction has its theoretical value and practical significance.Interpolation is used in trajectory reconstruction.The accuracy of trajectory reconstruction is affected by the accuracy of interpolation. In this study,the cubic Hermite interpolation is improved.The calculated slope is replaced by the derivative of the cubic polynomial.The results show that the accuracy of improved algorithm is better than that of the straight line interpolation, cubic spline interpolation and cubic Hermite interpolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transport Information and SafetySame topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207