MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Perioperative Course of Gabapentin Does Not Produce a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery

2016· article· en· W2977698749 on OpenAlexaff
David W. Monks, David Hoppe, Kristi Downey, Vibhuti Shah, Paul S. Bernstein, J.C.A. Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Anesthesia Digest · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGabapentinAnesthesiaAnalgesicCesarean deliveryPerioperativeAnesthesiologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

( Anesthesiology. 2015;123:320–326) Gabapentin is an analgesic that has proven itself to be beneficial perioperatively for several surgeries, some of which, such as abdominal hysterectomy, are similar to cesarean delivery. There is also extensive information on this drug from its use as an anticonvulsant, in which it has been shown to be safe for use during pregnancy and breastfeeding. But while there have been studies evaluating its efficacy for pain management following cesarean delivery, studies evaluating use of a single preoperative dose for pain management following cesarean delivery have not produced definitive results. The authors of this trial sought to test the analgesic effect of gabapentin when given perioperatively for cesarean delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetric Anesthesia DigestSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207