Structural optimization of two-girder composite cable-stayed bridges under dead and live loads
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A large number of variables are involved in the optimization of cable-stayed bridges, which makes the optimization impractical when many load cases are considered. To reduce the number of variables to be optimized, a discrete phases approach for structural optimization is developed in this study. The approach couples the finite element method with the genetic algorithm optimization approach. The design variables are divided into two categories: (i) main variables: number of stay cables, I-girder inertia, concrete slab thickness, and tower dimensions; and (ii) secondary variables: I-girder dimensions, stay-cable areas, and pre-tensioning forces. Two design objectives are tested: (i) lightest deck mass; and (ii) lowest material cost. Three load cases are considered: (i) dead and truck plus lane live loads; (ii) dead and lane live loads; and (iii) dead load. The results show the importance of considering the truck loads in structural optimization and the efficacy of the phases approach for different objectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it