MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Roadblocks to US Higher Education Access and Influence on US Long-term Economic Growth

2019· article· en· W2977758014 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiang-Rui Luo, Wei Wang, Qi Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueDEStech Transactions on Social Science Education and Human Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Productivity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)College educationHigher educationDemographic economicsEconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic growthPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has attracted attention that, despite having the best university system, US college enrollment rate has been stagnant since 1970 and remained much lower than other developed countries, such as Canada or EU countries. The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of education on economic progress, to explain the inconsistency between increasing college premium and stagnant college enrollment rate, and end up with possible policies. It is counter-intuitive that it is not the daunting US university tuition fee that discourage students from college. Instead, studies have shown that it is early-age education (from age of 3 to 5), living environment and marriage status of parents that determines the high school/college academic performance of a student.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDEStech Transactions on Social Science Education and Human ScienceSame topicEconomic Growth and ProductivityFrench-language works237,207