MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977769686 · doi:10.1111/chd.12842

A case series of left main coronary artery ostial atresia and a review of the literature

2019· review· en· W2977769686 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCongenital Heart Disease · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRevascularizationCardiologyInternal medicineArteryAtresiaStress testing (software)SurgeryRadiologyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Left main coronary artery ostial atresia (LMCAOA) is a rare congenital anomaly of the coronary arteries. The published literature regarding the current diagnostic and management recommendations are limited. We present three case series of LMCAOA from our institution, including one with a unique association with anomalous origin of left coronary artery (LCA) from pulmonary artery. In addition, this report includes a review of 50 pediatric and 43 adult cases from literature. The majority of the patients were symptomatic. Sudden cardiac death occurred in 10% of pediatric patients and 7% of adult patients. Almost half of pediatric patients had additional cardiac lesions. At the time of diagnosis, 82% of patients had abnormal exercise stress test and 73% had abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). The diagnosis of LMCAOA was suspected by echocardiography in 47% of pediatric patients, while 26% were initially misdiagnosed as anomalous origin of LCA from pulmonary artery. Coronary angiography confirmed the diagnosis in most cases and 70.5% of pediatric patients had small collaterals, while 80.5% of adult patients had large collaterals. Nine pediatric patients had no revascularization surgery with five deaths. Revascularization surgery was performed in 39 pediatric patients with four deaths. After 2005, there is a gradual shift toward performing coronary osteoplasty rather than coronary artery bypass grafting. Eighteen adult patients had revascularization surgery and all survived. Fifteen adult patients had no revascularization surgery, of which there were five deaths. In patients with LMCAOA, revascularization surgery is currently recommended in the presence of symptoms, ischemic changes on electrocardiogram or exercise stress test, myocardial perfusion defect on MPI, global left ventricular systolic dysfunction on echocardiogram, severe mitral regurgitation, or small-sized collaterals in coronary angiography. Short-term and mid-term outcomes are encouraging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it