MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977837980 · doi:10.1109/qrs.2019.00049

Fault Detection in Timed FSM with Timeouts by SAT-Solving

2019· article· en· W2977837980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalComputer Research Institute of Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityImplementationLift (data mining)Finite-state machineFault injectionFault detection and isolationConstraint (computer-aided design)Model checkingFault coverageDistributed computingEmbedded systemReal-time computingProgramming languageSoftwareData miningArtificial intelligenceActuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faults in safety critical real-time systems are not only logical, but they can correspond to violations of timing constraints. They must be detected to avoid system failures with adverse consequences. Developing efficient fault detection techniques for varieties of system models is still challenging. In this paper, we deal with fault detection for timed finite state machines with timeouts (TFSMs-T). TFSM-T is an extension of FSM to model timing constraints in safety-critical real-time systems. We lift a fault detection approach developed for FSM to generate tests detecting both logical faults and violations of time constraints in TFSMs-T. The approach is based on constraint solving and uses mutation machines to represent domains of faulty implementations (mutants) of a specification TFSMs-T. It also avoids enumerating the implementations one by one. We develop a prototype tool and we conduct experiments to evaluate the scalability of the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it