MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977845896 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11544

"You'll Get Used to It!": The Internment of Jewish Refugees in Canada, 1940-43

2016· dissertation· en· W2977845896 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christine Whitehouse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicThe Impact of Diversity and Innovation on Society
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeJudaismNazismImmigrationGender studiesPersecutionState (computer science)The HolocaustPower (physics)NarrativeAntisemitismLawDemocracyPolitical scienceHistorySociologyPoliticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After the fall of France in 1940, when German invasion of the British Isles seemed imminent, some 2000 Jewish refugees from Nazi oppression were detained by the British Home Office as dangerous "enemy aliens" and sent to Canada to be interned for the duration of the war.While the British government admitted its mistake in interning the refugees within months of their arrest, the Canadian government continued to keep them behind barbed wire for up to three years, reflecting its administration's anti-semitic immigration policies more broadly.Instead of using their case as a signpost in Canada's liberalizing immigration history, this dissertation situates their story in a longer narrative of class and ethnic discrimination to show the troubling foundations of modern democracy.As one tool in the nation state's normalizing project, incarceration attempted to mould the Jewish men in the state's eye.How the refugees pushed back in a joint claim of selfhood forms the material basis of this study.Through their relationship with the spaces of internment, work and leisure, sexual desire and gender performance, and by protesting governmental power, the refugees' identities evolved and coalesced, demonstrating the fluidity of modern selfhood despite the limiting power of nationhood.The internees' evolving sense of self played a large role in their experience and the development of their collective postwar narrative which trumpets their own success in Canada; while the state differentiated them from its own citizenry, the Jewish refugees pushed back in order to be seen as valuable contributors to the national body.Consequently, their collective memory of internment as a continuation of that project and, finally, as evidence of its fulfillment constitutes a critical part of internment history.By broadening the framework of Jewish internment during WWII, a pattern of differing and detaining under the mores of modern democracy emerges.The journey to completion took some unexpected twists and turns, so I am indebted to those who helped me in myriad ways to see this project through.The History Department at Carleton University was very supportive and accommodating when I decided to change research topics more than two years into the program.It was partly due to coursework and faculty members' innovative approaches to studying the past that I was motivated to make the switch.I am especially grateful for the support of my supervisor Dr. Jennifer Evans who continued to act as mentor even as the project drifted thematically from her own research interests.Her critical eye has undoubtedly made me a better historian over the course of my graduate studies.Dr. Rhonda Hinther agreed to come on board as co-supervisor to help flesh out the Canadian side of the project in my final year.However, her role quickly grew as she helped me navigate the transition from PhD to life, connecting me with various networks.In addition to the guidance of my cosupervisors, I was fortunate to have several faculty members from outside History take an early interest in my work.Thanks especially to Drs.Deidre Butler and James Casteel for their insightful feedback.I would like to thank the organizations whose financial support made days spent in the archives researching and writing a little less stressful.In addition

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0450.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThe Impact of Diversity and Innovation on SocietyFrench-language works237,207