Synchronization in Kuramoto Oscillator Networks With Sampled-Data Updating Law
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, we are concerned with the synchronization problem of Kuramoto oscillators under the sampled-data updating law. This article is motivated by the needs of synchronization of Kuramoto oscillators in the presence of periodic and asynchronous coupling updates. Based on the periodical sampled-data method, a sufficient condition ensuring synchronization under periodic updates is derived. In order to relax the requirement of having all data updated simultaneously, an event-triggered law is designed to implement asynchronous coupling updates. Our synchronization analysis does not rely on any linearization technique around equilibrium points. Instead, we employ the Lyapunov stability theory and nonsmooth analysis technique to deduce the synchronization conditions and estimate the region of attraction. The effectiveness of the proposed sampled-data coupling is illustrated by numerical simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it