Knowledge of Northern Ontario School of Medicine students on the subject of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canadian physicians report feeling unprepared regarding the diagnosis and treatment \nFetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). This thesis investigates the knowledge that future \nhealthcare practitioners gain during their time at the Northern Ontario School of Medicine \n(NOSM), as well as the advice they would give to women regarding the use of alcohol during \npregnancy. \nThis two-phased mixed methods study included two surveys (N=24), and a semistructured \ninterview (N=8). Results indicate that NOSM students are unaware of the specifics of \nFASD and are not confident in their knowledge on the subject. Barriers to learning were \nidentified as: (1) inconsistencies between student educational experiences; and (2) the \noverwhelming nature of medical education. Solutions involving enhanced opportunity for \nexposure, supporting experience through formal curriculum, and attaining knowledge from \ndifferent sources are proposed. Through improving medical education, future physicians will be \nbetter prepared to care for individuals with FASD, thereby improving support for these \nindividuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".