MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977899395 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab4917

Intraoperative cone-beam CT spatial priors for diffuse optical fluorescence tomography

2019· article· en· W2977899395 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael J. Daly, Harley Chan, Nidal Muhanna, Margarete K. Akens, Brian C. Wilson, Jonathan C. Irish, David A. Jaffray

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCone beam computed tomographyDiffuse optical imagingIndocyanine greenBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceOpticsOptical tomographyOptical coherence tomographyTomographyFluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopyComputer sciencePhysicsFluorescenceMedicineRadiologyComputed tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hybrid system for intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging and continuous-wave fluorescence tomography (FT) has been developed using an image-guidance framework. Intraoperative CBCT images with sub-millimeter spatial resolution are acquired with a flat-panel C-Arm. Tetrahedral meshes are generated from CBCT for finite element method implementation of diffuse optical tomography (NIRFAST). Structural data from CBCT is incorporated directly into the optical reconstruction process using Laplacian-type regularization ('soft spatial priors'). Experiments were performed using an in-house optical system designed for indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence. A dynamic non-contact geometry was achieved using a stereoscopic optical tracker for real-time localization of a laser diode and CCD camera. Source and detector positions were projected onto the boundary elements of the tissue mesh using algorithms for ray-triangle intersection and camera lens calibration. Simulation studies showed the capabilities of a soft-prior approach, even in the presence of segmentation uncertainties. Experiments with ICG targets embedded in liquid phantoms determined the improvements in the quantification of the fluorophore yield, with errors of 85% and <20% for no priors and spatial priors, respectively. Similar results were observed with the ICG target embedded in ex vivo porcine loin, with errors of 52% and 12%, respectively. A proof-of-principal animal study was performed in a VX2-tumor in vivo rabbit model using liposomal nanoparticles co-encapsulating contrast for CT (iohexol) and fluorescence (ICG) imaging. Fusion of CBCT and FT reconstructions demonstrated concurrent anatomical and functional delineations of contrast enhancement around the periphery of the buccal tumor. These developments motivate future clinical translation of the FT system into an ongoing CBCT-guided head and neck surgery trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207