Novel functional insights revealed by distinct protein-protein interactions of the residual SWI/SNF complex in SMARCA4-deficient small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chromatin remodeling plays a critical role in tumor suppression as demonstrated by 20% of human cancers bearing inactivating mutations in SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex members. Mutations in different SWI/SNF subunits drive a variety of adult and pediatric tumor types, including non-small cell lung cancers, rhabdoid tumors, medulloblastomas, and ovarian cancers. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is an aggressive subtype of ovarian cancer occurring in young women. Nearly all (>98%) SCCOHTs have inactivating mutations in SMARCA4 , which encodes 1 of 2 mutually exclusive catalytic subunits of the SWI/SNF complex. Less than half of SCCOHT patients survive 5 years despite aggressive surgery and multimodal chemotherapy. Empirical support for effective SCCOHT treatments is scarce, in part because of the poor understanding of SCCOHT tumorigenesis. To gain insight into the functional consequences of SWI/SNF subunit loss, we defined SWI/SNF composition and its protein-protein interactions (PPIs) by immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry (IP-MS) of SWI/SNF subunits in 3 SCCOHT cell lines. Comparing these results to a cell line containing a wild-type SWI/SNF complex, the interaction of most canonical core SWI/SNF subunits was observed in all SCCOHT cell lines at a lower abundance. The SCCOHT SWI/SNF also lacked ATPase module subunits and showed a drastic reduction in PBAF-specific subunit interactions. The wild-type and SCCOHT SWI/SNF subunits immunoprecipitated a shared set of 26 proteins, including core SWI/SNF subunits and RNA processing proteins. We observed 131 proteins exclusively interacting with the wild-type SWI/SNF complex including isoform-specific SWI/SNF subunits, members of the NuRD complex, and members of the MLL3/4 complex. We observed 60 PPIs exclusive to the SCCOHT residual SWI/SNF shared in at least 2 of the 3 SCCOHT cell lines, including many proteins involved in RNA processing. Differential interactions with the residual SWI/SNF complex in SCCOHT may further elucidate altered functional consequences of SMARCA4 mutations in these tumors as well as identify synthetic lethal targets that translate to other SWI/SNF-deficient tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".