MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977913016 · doi:10.17235/reed.2019.6264/2019

A tricky pancreatic stone face to an expanding endoscopic armamentarium: we can lose a battle but not the war

2019· article· en· W2977913016 on OpenAlexaff
Enrique Pérez‐Cuadrado‐Robles, Paul Kisoka, Benjamin Alexandre, Pierre H. Deprez

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLithotripsyPancreatitisExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsySurgeryGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 43-year-old female with hereditary chronic pancreatitis presented with increasing pancreatic pain and multiple pancreatic stones, despite extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and pancreatic stenting 12 months previously. Direct lithotripsy was performed via endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography and the stones were further evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Española de Enfermedades DigestivasSame topicPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207