MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977947721 · doi:10.7939/r38p5vq1c

The Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Reservoir Characteristics of the Montney D1 and D2 Horizons, Greater Pouce Coupe Area, Alberta and British Columbia

2016· article· en· W2977947721 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Donald Prenoslo

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentologyStratigraphyPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Middle Montney D1 and D2 Horizons in the Greater Pouce Coupe Area are important exploration targets. These moderate porosity and low permeability siltstone units have been referred to as distal shelf deposits in the past, based primarily on their restricted grain size. The D1 and D2 Horizons host a considerable volume of liquids rich natural gas. Considering this, a refined and robust interpretation of the paleodepositional setting and stratigraphic architecture of these units is crucial to facilitate exploration success. To achieve this objective, detailed sedimentological and ichnological data was recorded from 31 cores within an area of approximately 3200 km2. Geophysical logs from 1000 wells were analyzed to correlate important surfaces and to understand the distribution of the D1 and D2 Horizons throughout the study area. Additionally, XRF derived elemental compositions were used to confirm and refine sequence stratigraphic interpretations and were used as proxies to infer changes in D1 and D2 Horizons depositional processes. Eight distinct lithofacies are identified from the dataset. Lithofacies analyses indicate that the studied strata represent distal offshore to offshore-transition sedimentary environments. Linear sourced turbidity currents are thought to be the most important mechanism for sediment deposition. An arid coastline with numerous ephemeral river systems transported large volumes of sediment to the coast during storms. This may have created an over steepened shoreface / wave-dominated delta profile, which was prone to mass wasting events. Additionally, the study area was in a structurally complex setting, and as a result syn-depositional structural reactivations would have been equally likely to trigger mass wasting events. The D1-D2 transition is characterized by the presence of silty shale beds. The presence of appreciable amounts of clay in the Montney is rare except for a few areas. These areas are interpreted to have been deposited under the influence of perennial deltaic systems. During the D1-D2 transition silty shale beds indicate that there was a perennial river system running through the Hines Creek Graben sourcing clay. This work has contributed to the understanding of the sedimentology and the stratigraphic architecture of the Montney Formation in the Greater Pouce Coupe Area that will help decrease exploration risk. Ideally, the integration of detailed sedimentologic observations with regional mapping and geochemistry shown within this work will aid in other studies of the Montney Formation as well as in other unconventional plays around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.142
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207