MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978078088 · doi:10.3968/11225

Murdoch on Good and Evil

2019· article· en· W2978078088 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chang Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and Literary Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealmBuddhismBalance (ability)PhilosophyEnvironmental ethicsMoralityAestheticsSociologyEpistemologyLawPsychologyPolitical scienceTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iris Murdoch is the most outstanding British moral philosopher in the 20th century. Her philosophical researches concentrate on the moral awareness of British people in the sea of turmoil caused by the confrontations between material world and spiritual realm. She holds that in the modern world where God is absent, people should take the highest goodness as their moral belief. She endeavors to provide people in the West with Oriental Buddhism to achieve spiritual salvation. As a sentient being, one can surpass the boundaries and get rid of those things obsessing him, and in this manner, he can have a clear idea about the real world in which other people live and strike a balance between himself and otherness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicPhilosophy and Literary AnalysisFrench-language works237,207