MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978135135 · doi:10.1177/0741713619881110

Book Review: <i>Continuing Professional Education in Australia: A Tale of Missed Opportunities</i> , by B. Brennan

2019· article· en· W2978135135 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven Hodge

Bibliographic record

VenueAdult Education Quarterly · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinuing educationContinuing professional developmentProfessional developmentPedagogyPolitical scienceSociologyMedical educationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barrie Brennan’s Continuing Professional Education in Australia: A Tale of Missed Opportunities is a valuable piece of scholarship. It is the fruit of years of engagement in the field and deep reflection. Brennan’s concern is a special topic in the broader field of adult and lifelong education and learning, that of continuing professional education (CPE) in Australia. If you are not interested in developments in this part of the field, it is possible you will be overwhelmed by the local detail in this thoroughly researched book. But if you have an interest in this part of the field, this book will be your new standard reference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdult Education QuarterlySame topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207