MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978215673 · doi:10.3390/rs11192274

Field-Scale Rice Yield Estimation Using Sentinel-1A Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Data in Coastal Saline Region of Jiangsu Province, China

2019· article· en· W2978215673 on OpenAlexaff
Jianjun Wang, Qixing Dai, Jiali Shang, Xiuliang Jin, Quan Sun, Guisheng Zhou, Qigen Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersPriority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education InstitutionsNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsRemote sensingSynthetic aperture radarEnvironmental scienceBackscatter (email)GeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, a large number of salterns have been converted into rice fields in the coastal region of Jiangsu Province, Eastern China. The high spatial heterogeneity of soil salinity has caused large within-field variabilities in grain yield of rice. The identification of low-yield areas within a field is an important initial step for precision farming. While optical satellite remote sensing can provide valuable information on crop growth and yield potential, the availability of cloud-free optical image data is often hampered by unfavorable weather conditions. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) offers an alternative due to its nearly day-and-night and all-weather capability in data acquisition. Given the free data access of the Sentinels, this study aimed at developing a Sentinel-1A-based SAR index for rice yield estimation. The proposed SAR simple difference (SSD) index uses the change of the Sentinel-1A backscatter in vertical-horizontal (VH) polarization between the end of the tillering stage and the end of grain filling stage (SSDVH). A strong exponential relationship has been identified between the SSDVH and rice yield, producing accurate yield estimation with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.74 t ha−1 and a relative error (RE) of 7.93%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207