La domination de la mère dans le film J'ai tué ma mère de Xavier Dolan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="Abstract">This article is about the representation of maternal domination and&nbsp;<span style="font-size: 1rem;">the trial in the film&nbsp;</span>J’ai tué ma mère&nbsp;<span style="font-size: 1rem;">&nbsp;of Xavier Dolan through narrative&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">and cinematographic film aspects. The analysis is supported by Michel&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">Foucault’s concept of power to see the shape of dominance of the&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">mother figure that occurs in the film. The power is the cornerstone of&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">the training of domination that leads to repression against others,&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">including within the family. The results of the analysis through&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">narrative and cinematographic aspects of the film shows that&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">dominance is formed due to the failure of the communication that&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">exists between the forces and causes the formation of resistance by&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">the dominated figures, the boy. The power and the domination of a&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">very large maternal figure in the figure of the boy life causes problems&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">and conflicts between them, thus creating a distance in the&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">relationship between the mother and the child. The resistance of the&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">dominant figure is intended to challenge the power of domination.&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">Dominance is also reinforced by the matriarchal cultural factors&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">within the culture of the community in Quebec, which is the setting for&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">the film.</span></p><p class="Abstract"><span lang="FR"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".