MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978304825 · doi:10.11575/prism/37163

Treatment of Oil-Sands Produced Water by Electrocoagulation

2019· dissertation· en· W2978304825 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsOil sandsElectrocoagulationEnvironmental sciencePetroleum engineeringWaste managementGeologyEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringGeographyAsphaltArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Alberta, the oil-sands industry plays an important role in the local economy. However, the industry consumes a large amount of water, which is not economical. Significant capital and operating costs have been invested by the oil industries in the treatment of this contaminated water every year. Our objective is to develop new treatment solutions for the removal of contaminants, particularly silica but also organics and some hardness, using electrocoagulation to enable increased water recycling while decreasing capital and operating costs. The treatment of oil sands produced water by electrocoagulation is explored and investigated in this research. The major contaminant targeted is dissolved silica, which is the cause of the scaling problem in the steam generators in the oil-sands production process. Electrocoagulation is found to be very efficient to remove dissolved Si from approximately 60 mg/L to less than 5 mg/L, corresponding to greater than 90% Si removal. In addition, removal of 90% of the calcium present, and 60% of the magnesium could be achieved. The effect of operating parameters on electrocoagulation performance were evaluated, including the anode materials (aluminum and iron), current density, inter-electrode distance, and dissolved oxygen. Current density of 8 mA/cm2 was found to be the most efficient and also economical compared to 4 and 16 mA/cm2. Increasing the inter-electrode distance results in lower contaminant removal and higher energy consumption. Dissolved oxygen is important for enhancement in Fe-EC. The current efficiencies for metal dissolution obtained with aluminum and iron electrodes materials, as well as their electrochemical behavior, was investigated. Fe-EC had current efficiencies between 90-95%, while Al-EC showed larger than 100% current efficiencies. Besides operating parameters, different electrochemical reactor designs were also tested. Experiments were carried out in system and flow recirculation systems. A novel concept of utilizing an oscillating anode in EC was tested with both batch and recirculating flow. The combination of a batch recirculating flow reactor and anode oscillation showed the best contaminant removal performance. Investigation of the viability of EC for oil sands industry applications such as oil-sands produced water and boiler blowdown water samples have also been carried out, and the Si removal efficiency is also promising compared to the synthetic produced water. The operating cost of our EC treatments is also in the lower range compared to the general EC operating costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it