MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978340530 · doi:10.1021/bk-2000-0761.ch018

Influence of Natural Organic Matter on Bromate Formation During Ozonation of Low-Bromide Drinking Waters: A Multi-Level Assessment of Bromate

2000· book-chapter· en· W2978340530 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christopher J. Douville, Gary Amy

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de PoitiersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignAmerican Water Works Association Research FoundationWater Research Foundation
KeywordsBromateNatural organic matterOzoneBromideOrganic matterChemistryContactorEnvironmental scienceDisinfectantWaste managementWater treatmentEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental chemistryPulp and paper industryEngineeringInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multi-level approach is used to assess bromate formation. The size, structure and functionality of natural organic matter (NOM) and its role in bromate formation is being investigated via a nationwide survey of ozonation facilities, bench-scale ozonation and simultaneous NOM characterization of source waters, as well as scale-up comparison testing between bench-, pilot-, and full-scale ozone contactors. Initial results indicate that many utilities will be faced with the challenge of optimizing their ozonation process in order to achieve the desired Cryptosporidium inactivation, that may become a consequence of the proposed Stage 2 Disinfectant/Disinfection By-Product (D/DBP) Rule, along with compliance of the existing Stage 1 bromate standard of 10 µg/L. Ongoing work will continue to show that a solid understanding of the character of the NOM will enable utilities to predict how NOM will either inhibit or promote bromate formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS symposium seriesSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207