Chelation of metal ions with citric acid in the ammoniation process of wet‐process phosphoric acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new process is proposed in which citric acid is added during the ammoniation process of wet‐process phosphoric acid (WPA) to chelate metal ions to produce fertilizer ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (MAP) containing medium trace elements. The parameters of the chelation reaction were studied systematically and the results show that the optimal reaction condition is pH 3.0, reaction time 60 minutes, temperature 50.0°C, and citric acid content 1.48%. The XRD patterns show that the water‐insoluble compounds are complex mixtures, and the composition of the water‐insoluble compounds are changed through the addition of citric acid. FTIR and XPS analyes further demonstrate that water‐insoluble compounds are complex mixtures. The XRD patterns of the MAP products indicate that the structure and morphology of the MAP were changed by the addition of citric acid. In addition, the contents of major elements, medium elements, and trace elements in the MAP product are 68.72%, 0.24%, and 0.50%, respectively, which is consistent with the relevant China national standard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".