A proximity-dependent biotinylation map of a human cell: an interactive web resource
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Compartmentalization is a defining characteristic of eukaryotic cells, partitioning cellular processes into discrete subcellular locations. High throughput microscopy 1 and biochemical fractionation coupled with mass spectrometry 2–6 have helped to define the proteomes of a variety of organelles and macromolecular structures. However, many other intracellular compartments have remained refractory to such approaches, due for example to difficulty in purifying non-membrane bound structures. Proximity-dependent biotinylation techniques such as BioID provide an alternative approach for defining the composition of cellular compartments in living cells 7–10 . Here we present a BioID-based map of a human cell based on 192 markers from 32 different subcellular compartments, comprising 35,902 high confidence proximity interactions, and defining the intracellular locations of 4,145 unique proteins in HEK 293 cells. Our localization predictions meet or exceed previous-approaches, with higher specificity, and enabled the discovery of proteins at the mitochondrial outer membrane-endoplasmic reticulum (ER) interface that are critical for mitochondrial homeostasis. Based on this dataset, we have established humancellmap.org as a community resource that provides online tools for localization analysis of user BioID data, and demonstrate how this resource can be used to better understand BioID datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it