MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978590450

Determination and Analysis of Insect-resistant Character in Transgenic Poplars NL-80106

2004· article· en· W2978590450 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guo TongBin, Ji BaoZhong, Qiang Zhuge, Jihong Jiang, Yameng Bai, Wu Wei, Mingren Huang

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTransgeneGeneGenetically modified cropsInsectBotanyGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transgenic poplars NL -80106 with Bt genes planted in the field were detected by PCR. The results showed that there were the special fragments of Bt genes in 5 transgenic clones with single Bt gene (FB40,FB45,FB56,FB59,FB60) and 4 transgenic colnes with two insect-resistant (Bt+CpTI) genes (D9,D18,D27,D32). The leaves from 12 rtansgenic insect-resistant poplars were analyzed by ELISA and showed that the expressing quantity of Bt insecticidal protein in D18 is 6 754 ng/g fresh leaf (0.090% of plant soluble protein), which is the highest in the transgenic clones with two-insect-resistant genes. In the transgenic clones with single Bt gene, the expressing quantity of FB51 is 6 796 ng/g fresh leaf and it amounts to 0.036% of plant soluble protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207