MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2978633746 · doi:10.4095/293118

Polymetallic U-Ag veins at Port Radium, Great Bear magmatic zone, Canada: main botryoidal pitchblende stage cuts 1.74 Ga diabase dykes and has REE signatures diagnostic of unconformity-type deposits

2013· report· en· W2978633746 on OpenAlexaffabout
S S Gandhi, E G Potter, Mostafa Fayek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUraniniteGeologyGeochemistryUnconformityStage (stratigraphy)PlutonPaleontologyUraniumSedimentary rockTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Eldorado mine at Port Radium produced 6,223 tonnes of U and 8 million ounces of Ag from 1942 - 1982, with smaller amounts of Ra, Co, Ni, Cu, Ag and Bi. Mining reached a depth of 511 m. The adjacent Echo Bay mine produced 25.5 million ounces of Ag. The metals were deposited along steep, NEtrending, late tectonic brittle faults in andesitic volcanics of the Great Bear magmatic zone (GBmz), a 1.87-1.84 Ga continental arc along the west margin of Wopmay Orogen. The brittle faults were healed by quartz veins with sparse chalcopyrite and pitchblende, then cut by 1.74 Ga Cleaver diabase dykes. Fault reactivation offset the dykes and led to 5 stages of polymetallic veins. The veins are cut by a gently dipping sheet of 1.59 Ga Western Channel diabase. The Lower Hornby Bay Group was deposited between the two diabase events, and was later eroded at Port Radium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→