MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Accuracy of the Patency Capsule to Exclude Small Bowel Strictures in Crohnʼs Disease: Is it Better to be Safe or Sorry?

2009· article· en· W2978669796 on OpenAlexaff
Florin Costea, Ernest G. Seidman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCapsuleCapsule endoscopyCrohn's diseaseRadiologyObscure gastrointestinal bleedingIngestionGastroenterologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is now a well established investigation for suspected Crohn's disease (CD). Its use in established CD has been limited, due in part to the relatively high risk (˜5%) of capsule retention. Barium radiography (SBFT) has not been found to be reliable to assure small bowel patency prior to CE in CD. The use of a patency capsule has thus been proposed as an alternate screening test for this purpose. Evacuation of the dummy capsule from the small bowel within a 30 h window indicates small bowel patency, whereas its retention beyond this time has been taken to imply a potential luminal stricture, contraindicating CE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility and safety of the patency capsule in established CD. Methods: Outcomes of consecutive CD cases referred for CE were reviewed before and after the systematic use of a patency capsule to screen for small bowel patency. Plain abdominal radiology (AxR) was used to localize the patency capsule 30 +/− 2 hr after ingestion. Results: Before the FDA approved introduction of the Agile patency capsule in 2006, we carried out small bowel CE in 31 CD patients without obstructive symptoms or any strictures seen on SBFT. Capsule retention occurred in 2 (6.7%) of these cases. Subsequently, 37 consecutive CD patients first underwent the patency capsule exam. Among these, 5 were denied CE because the patency capsule was localized to the small bowel radiologically 30 h after ingestion. Among the 32 others who underwent the CE exam, capsule retention occurred in 1 (3.2%) case. For the most recent 4 CD patients in whom the patency capsule position was deemed to be in the small bowel or its location was doubtful at 30 h, a second AxR was carried out at 48-60 h. In 3 of the latter, the repeat imaging showed that the patency capsule was eliminated intact from the small bowel. All 3 subsequently underwent a successful CE exam. CE was denied in the 1 remaining case with prolonged small bowel retention of the patency capsule. Conclusion: Subclinical intestinal stenoses are frequent in CD and conventional radiologic investigations have a low sensitivity for their detection. Use of a patency capsule use appears to reduce, but not completely eliminate the risk of capsule retention. However, the “safe” reliance on a 30 hour cut-off for patency capsule elimination from the small bowel may preclude a clinically worthwhile CE study. Further trials are required to validate the safety and clinical value of a delayed cut-off (˜48 hr) for intact patency capsule passage. Disclosure: Dr Ernest G Seidman- Consultant, member of Speaker's Bureau, and recipeint of research support from Given Imaging Inc. Given Imaging Inc. supplied a small number of patency capsules free of charge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207