L’anglicisme syntaxique : produit inévitable du contact des langues ?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il est communment admis que le contact linguistique provoque la convergence grammaticale. L'objectif de cette recherche est de proposer et d'appliquer une mthode empirique pour vrifier cette hypothse. Nous illustrons l'utilit de cette mthode par l'entremise du cas des prpositions sans rgime en franais, trait strotyp attribu l'influence de l'anglais. Nos rsultats, rvlent plusieurs preuves contrecarrant cette interprtation. En revanche, elles dmontrent que le candidat la convergence est plutt survenu par l'extension d'une tournure purement franaise un nouveau contexte. Nous concluons que le changement caus par le contact n'est pas donn d'emble ; il doit tre soigneusement tabli par une mthodologie scientifique telle que propose ici.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it