MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978725510

UMP invariance in adaptive detection: kernels that preserve monotone likelihood ratio

2003· article· en· W2978725510 on OpenAlex
S. Kraut, Louis L. Scharf, Ronald W. Butler

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMonotone polygonInvariant (physics)StatisticEstimatorSufficient statisticTest statisticApplied mathematicsNoise powerLikelihood-ratio testStatisticsStatistical hypothesis testingPower (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the question of optimality for the adaptive coherence estimator (ACE), which is an adaptive detection statistic for the problem in which noise in the training data is not constrained to have same power level as noise in the test data. Having previously shown that ACE is a maximal invariant statistic, we complete a proof that a threshold test on ACE is uniformly-most-powerful (UMP) invariant. This requires a second result, that the statistic possesses a monotone likelihood ratio (MLR). We establish the MLR property by relating it to the property of the density being a positive kernel. By repeatedly applying a basic composition formula for such kernels, we show that the density for ACE is totally positive. Thus the density has MLR, and a simple threshold test on ACE has the strict optimality property of being UMP-invariant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it