MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978740155 · doi:10.1002/9781119616801.ch4

Breeding Naked Barley for Food, Feed, and Malt

2019· other· en· W2978740155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brigid Meints, Patrick M. Hayes

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant breeding reviews · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytase and its Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHordeum vulgareBrewingBarley flourBiologyNaked DNACropBiotechnologyAgronomyFood scienceWheat flourPoaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barley (Hordeum vulgare) is a versatile crop with three principal end-uses: feed, food, and malt. Each end-use of barley requires different characteristics, but hull adherence and β-glucan content are important for each of the three classes. Most of the barley grown in the United States has an adhering hull, but a small percentage of the barley grown is hull-less, or “naked”. Naked barley shows potential as a crop that can be used for food, feed, and malt. This review covers research on breeding naked barley for multiple applications: feed, food, malting, brewing, and distilling. As a feed, naked barley contains higher levels of protein than covered barley or corn; based on numerous reports that naked barley is superior to covered barley for swine feed, breeders in Canada began breeding naked barley for swine feed in the 1970s. Barley foods are on the rebound due to fiber and whole grain nutrition health benefits. Breeders have been developing naked barley with increased levels of β-glucan for human consumption. Naked barley can present an opportunity to the malting and brewing community through significantly higher levels of malt extract and improved beer quality. Malting barley has traditionally been covered, but due to the potential advantages, breeders have begun developing naked lines specifically for brewing and distilling. Grower, producer, processer, and consumer communities with interests in innovation, health, and sustainability stand to benefit directly from breeders working to develop new multiuse barley varieties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant breeding reviewsSame topicPhytase and its ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207