MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978761093 · doi:10.32915/pleiade.v13i28.541

Construção do conhecimento e descolonização

2019· article· pt· W2978761093 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Kusano Bucalen Ferrari

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Pleiade · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience and Science Education
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo visa promover uma saudável polêmica e desconstruiro modelo hegemônico vigente de “produção” e “impacto” do conhecimentoque não interessa às nações menos desenvolvidas e privilegia apublicação compulsória em periódicos estrangeiros. O primeiro ponto é umacrítica à adoção reducionista de critérios bibliométricos como forma de classificaçãode revistas, seguida de outros aspectos crítico-reflexivos relacionadosao Sistema Qualis-Capes. Além de uma discussão crítica, pautada emconhecimento científico e filosófico, o presente artigo traz sugestões para aconstrução genuína do conhecimento e desconstrução do colonialismo científicovigente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.021
Scholarly communication0.0170.009
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista PleiadeSame topicScience and Science EducationFrench-language works237,207