INTERSECCIONALIDADE DESFEITA: salvando a interseccionalidade dos estudos feministas sobre interseccionalidade
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo identifica um conjunto de relacoes de poder dentro dos debates academicos feministas contemporâneos sobre que trabalham para despolitizar neutralizando o potencial critico da para uma mudanca orientada justica social. Num momento em que recebeu aclamacao internacional sem precedentes nos circulos academicos feministas, um feminismo academico especificamente disciplinar, em sintonia com economia do conhecimento neoliberal, se envolve com praticas argumentativas que reenquadram e minam. Este artigo analisa varias tendencias especificas de debate que neutralizam o potencial politico da interseccionalidade, como o confinamento da um exercicio academico de contemplacao metateorica, bem como um branqueamento da interseccionalidade atraves de afirmacoes de que e a invencao do feminismo, e requer uma genealogia mais ampla da interseccionalidade reformulada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it