MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978845536 · doi:10.4000/books.puam.1933

La compensation écologique, une valeur montante du droit de l’environnement

2016· book-chapter· fr· W2978845536 on OpenAlexaff
Pascale Steichen

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Conservation and Management
Canadian institutionsPrivy Council Office
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La compensation en droit de l’environnement se distingue de la com­pensation telle qu’on la trouve dans notre Code civil, à l’article 1347. Cette dernière désigne un mécanisme autonome d’extinction des obligations entre deux personnes qui sont réciproquement créancières et débitrices l’une envers l’autre La créance et la dette s’annulent mutuellement à concurrence de la somme la plus faible de sorte que, si elles ne sont pas d’un montant égal, seul le solde devient exigible. En droit civil, p...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille eBooksSame topicEnvironmental Conservation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207