MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978872052

Changes in the Emergent Plant Community of Netley-Libau Marsh Between 1979 and 2001

2004· article· en· W2978872052 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Grosshans, Dale A. Wrubleski, L. Gordon Goldsborough

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarshEnvironmental scienceGeographyWetlandEcologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We used aerial photography combined with field observations to develop a detailed aquatic vegetation map for Netley-Libau Marsh in south-central Manitoba. This report describes the creation of a new geographically accurate map (georeferenced for use in a Geographic Information System - GIS), based on aerial photos taken in 2001, and construction of a detailed vegetation map for evaluating the changing state of Netley-Libau Marsh. This provides a basis for comparison with a 1979 vegetation map enabling a quantitative assessment of changes in the marsh over a 22-year period. Comparisons between 1979 and 2001 reveal several significant changes in Netley-Libau Marsh. Loss of emergent vegetation and the erosion of separating uplands between adjoining water bodies has been extensive, resulting in the amalgamation and expansion of many marsh bays and ponds. Currently, half of the entire marsh (13,125 ha, 51%) is open water, compared to 35% (8,884 ha) in 1979. Cattail (Typha spp.) continues to be the dominant emergent plant in the marsh, showing little change between surveys. However, hard- and soft-stem bulrush (Schoenoplectus spp.) have declined ten-fold in abundance, from 3,247 ha (13%) to 317 ha (1%). The mixed river bulrush and sedge community, along with the wet meadow communities, have also declined in abundance. Plant communities at drier sites, however, have remained relatively unchanged. Reasons for the observed changes in the marsh are not well known or understood, but change is not a recent development. Maps of the marsh from the 1920s to the present show a pattern of increasing open water area and loss of upland and island habitats. These changes are likely related to a number of factors, but the influence of Lake Winnipeg and the Red River are likely the most important. Lake Winnipeg dictates water levels within Netley-Libau Marsh. Since the droughts of the 1930s and 1940s, water levels on Lake Winnipeg and the marsh have included few intervening dry periods. Without extended dry periods, to periodically allow the germination of new emergent vegetation, there has been a slow but consistent loss of emergent vegetation in the marsh. As this vegetation is lost, the protection that it provides for the soft sediments that make up island and upland habitats is also lost, and these habitats are slowly being washed away. The current management of Lake Winnipeg for hydroelectric production works to prevent low water levels on the lake and the marsh. The Red River passes through Netley-Libau Marsh and it has likely contributed to some of the observed changes. High flow events on the river result in the erosion and collapse of weak points in the levees that border the river and other channels. Netley Cut, which was originally dredged in 1913, has been gradually eroded to a point where it now carries a substantial portion of the Red River flow into Netley Lake. The end of dredging on the Red River in 1999 has also likely contributed to the alteration of Red River flows through the marsh. High nutrient loads in the Red River, along with the arrival of common carp, may be contributing to enhanced algal growth and loss of submersed vegetation within the marsh. Loss of submersed vegetation results in the destabilization of bottom sediments and increased wind-induced wave action, which further helps erode island and upland habitats. Without an ability to manage marsh water levels independently of Lake Winnipeg, only a prolonged drought will help restore the emergent plant communities of Netley-Libau Marsh. Dry conditions experienced in 2003 helped re-establish some of the emergent plant communities of the marsh, but the recent return to wet conditions may make this reversal short-lived. We conclude that Netley-Libau Marsh resembles a shallow turbid lake more than a healthy coastal wetland. Any benefits to Lake Winnipeg which the marsh could provide as wildlife and fisheries habitat, and in removing and storing nutrients that would otherwise enrich the lake, have probably been degraded or lost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207