MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978874859 · doi:10.1002/uog.21351

EP12.17: Decreased left heart flow is sufficient to produce hypoplasia in mid‐gestation fetal lambs

2019· article· en· W2978874859 on OpenAlexaff
Rajiv Chaturvedi, Johannes Keunen, Barbra de Vrijer, Greg Ryan, Edgar Jaeggi

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyHypoplastic left heart syndromeInternal medicineAscending aortaAortic valveHypoplasiaFetal echocardiographyPreloadAortaDiastoleFetusHemodynamicsHeart diseasePregnancyBlood pressurePrenatal diagnosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A decrease in fetal left heart flow has been proposed as the cause of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). Supravalvar aortic banding in fetal lambs led to conflicting results as to whether left ventricular (LV) hypoplasia or hypertrophy occurred. LV inflow obsturction was poorly tolerated in 90-120 day fetal lambs who died within 7 days from hydrops. We attempted a more gradual onset of LV inflow obstruction in 75 day old fetal lambs. Coils were implanted in the left atrium guided by ultrasound, using a 22G needle under aseptic technique in 75 day fetal lambs. Survivors underwent echocardiography 50 days later and were harvested. 15 of 34 coiled fetuses reached 125 days, 5 had no inflow obstruction (sham controls), 1 had anasarca due to coil-induced severe maitral regurgitation and 9 had sufficiently decreased LV inflow/preload so that antegrade aortic valve flow was so reduced that there was compensatory retrograde flow in the ascending aorta from the duct. Four of five with retrograde aortic flow had no antegrade aortic valve flow (no_aov_flow), and these had the most severe left heart hypoplasia. LV free-wall/RV free-wall weight: no_aov_flow 0.63 + 0.19, controls 0.99 + 0.17, p = 0.008. Aortic valve/Pulmonary valve diameter: no_aov_flow 0.48 + 0.03, controls 0.82 + 0.15, p = 0.0004. Ascending aorta/Pulmonary artery diameter: no_aov_flow 0.56 + 0.09, controls 0.83 + 0.11, p = 0.0004. LV end-diastolic/RV end-diastolic diameter: no_aov_flow 0.48 + 0.23, controls 1.0 + 0.12, p = 0.0021. LV end-diastolic/RV end-diastolic length: no_aov_flow 0.67 + 0.21, 1.13 + 0.17, p = 0.0036. Long after cardiogenesis has been completed, a severe prolonged decrease in left heart flow is sufficient to produce LV and ascending aortic hypoplasia. In the most severe cases, there was no antegrade aortic valve flow and perfusion of the brain and coroanries was wholly retrograde from the duct. This recapitulates much of human HLHS fetal physiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207