MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Early Kidney Dysfunction After Liver Transplantation Is Associated With Reduced Graft and Patient Survival

2014· article· en· W2978881446 on OpenAlexaff
Rahima A. Bhanji, Mang Ma, Vincent G. Bain, Aldo J. Montaño‐Loza

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCirrhosisKidney diseaseRenal functionInternal medicineLiver transplantationGastroenterologyTransplantationCreatinineChronic liver diseaseLiver diseaseRenal replacement therapyDiabetes mellitusRisk factorEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In this study, we aimed at investigating the frequencies of acute renal dysfunction (ARD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) post-liver transplant (LT), the risk factors associated with renal dysfunction post-LT, and to determine the clinical impact of renal dysfunction with regards to both graft and patient survival after LT. Methods: We analyzed 535 patients with cirrhosis who received a liver transplant over the period of 1989 to 2010. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was determined using the 4 variable MDRD formula, ARD was defined as eGFR >90 ml/min prior to transplant, followed by eGFR <60 ml/min at 3 months post-LT, and CKD was defined as eGFR <60 ml/min after LT, evidence of intrinsic renal disease, or need for renal replacement therapy. Results: Three hundred fifty-nine were males (67%), and the mean age at LT was 52±10 years. Cirrhosis etiology was HCV cirrhosis (35%), alcohol cirrhosis (33%), autoimmune liver disease (25%), NASH (2%), and HBV (6%). Diabetes was present in 180 (34%), and hypertension in 244 patients (46%) prior to LT. Mean serum creatinine level was 111±80 μmol/L, and 186 patients (35%) had a diagnosis of CKD prior to LT. ARD was documented in 34 patients (6%) after LT, and a new diagnosis of CKD post-LT was made in 88 patients (16%). Risk factors associated with development of ARD were age >60 years (14 vs. 6%; p=0.01) and male gender (12 vs. 5%; p=0.01). Risk factors for development of CKD post-LT were diabetes (23 vs. 13%; p=0.003) and hypertension (22 vs. 12%; p=0.001). Graft survival (133±13 vs. 168 ±11 months; p=0.03) and patient survival were significantly reduced when eGFR was <60 ml/min at 3 months (133±13 vs. 185±12 months; p=0.006; Figure 1). Hazard ratio for mortality was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.3; p=0.006) for those patients with eGFR <60 ml/min at 3 months.Figure 1Conclusion: ARD and CKD are frequent complications after LT. Older age and male gender are associated with a higher risk for ARD, whereas diabetes, hypertension, and early reduction in the eGFR are associated with higher risk of CKD after. Recognition of early kidney dysfunction after LT is important in an effort to establish strategies to improve graft and patient survival after LT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicLiver Disease and Transplantation→French-language works237,207→