Historical and theological comparisons, controversies and polarities in the works of Marcus Antonius de Dominis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
de Dominis was one of the most distinguished fi gures and personalities at the turn of the 16 th into the 17 th century, and he excelled both in the fi elds of the natural and theological sciences.He was fi rst the bishop of Senj and later the archbishop of Split.M. A. de Dominis was predominantly occupied with the question of why Christianity was so divided in itself among its numerous churches and denominations.Generally speaking with regards to his day and age: in the last two decades of the 16th and the fi rst quarter of the 17th century the main concern pertaining to religious thought was the clash between the two concepts around which the Church was organized.In his quest for the truth, De Dominis always questioned the original thought and the teachings of Jesus Christ himself in order to ascertain which of these two ways was the correct one.Th erefore, de Dominis sought the third way in the form of religious tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".