Civil Conversation, Religious Controversy, and <i>The New Inn</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jonson présente dans sa pièce The New Inn (1629) le parallèle éthique s'établissant entre l'hôtel et l'église en tant qu'espaces où le discours et la conduite laïcs, qui, infléchis par la bonne foi, rendent possible une revitalisation des échanges sociaux. L'éthique présentée dans la pièce est suffisamment générale pour permettre aux discours sociaux et religieux, incluant le discours puritain, de gagner en force et en crédibilité. Jonson allie la liberté traditionnelle propre à l'hôtel au concept de la Renaissance de salubrité et de pragmatisme de la conversation laïque. Il y ajoute aussi l'idéal typiquement Jacobain de communion œcuménique inclusive dans le but de mettre encore davantage en relief la puissance comique de la pièce dans son traitement de la socialisation et de la fantaisie romantique de l'amour renouvelé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".